RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01087
XXXX COUNSEL: XXXXX
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
The Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 12 May 11, 15 Nov 11, and 10 Sept 12 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS).
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He had an unknown/untreated metabolic condition during the 12 May 11 and 15 Nov 11 contested FAs, which precluded him from obtaining a satisfactory overall rating.
During the 1.5 mile run on the 10 Sept 12 contested FA, he experience an exercise induced asthma flare-up which precluded him from obtaining a satisfactory score.
The medical condition has been validated through a medical evaluation.
In support of the appeal, the applicant submits AF Forms 108, Physical Fitness Education and Intervention Processing, dated 15 Nov 11, and 10 Sep 12.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in the grade of Major (O-4).
On 12 May 2011 and 15 Nov 2011, the applicant participated in the contested FAs and attained an unsatisfactory score on both assessments. Information extracted from AFFMS indicates on the 12 May 11 FA, he was exempt from performing cardio, push-ups and sit-ups. On the 15 Nov 11 FA, he was not exempt from any portion of the assessment.
In April 2012, the applicant was notified that he was diagnosed with a metabolic condition back in December 2008 but had never been informed or treated for the condition. After becoming aware of the condition and treatment was started, an Air Force Form 108 was completed by a military physician to stating that his condition would cause him to gain weight.
On 28 September 2012, the applicant participated in a contested FA and attained an unsatisfactory score. During the 1.5 mile run, he experienced an exercise induced asthma attack which he had been previously diagnosed in his medical records. Information extracted from AFFMS indicates that he was exempt from performing the abdominal circumference, push-ups and sit-ups.
The applicants last eight FA results are as follows:
Date
Composite Score
Rating
26 Nov 13
79.00
Satisfactory
26 Jul 13
77.20
Unsatisfactory
1 Mar 13
EXEMPT
EXEMPT
31 Dec 12
23.75
Unsatisfactory
*10 Sept 12
64.67
Unsatisfactory
27 Feb 12
78.30
Satisfactory
*15 Nov 11
68.20
Unsatisfactory
*12 May 11
63.00
Unsatisfactory
* Contested FA
In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, if an Airman becomes injured or ill during the FA and is unable to complete all required components, he/she will have the option of being evaluated at the Medical Treatment Facility (MTF) but his/her test will still count unless rendered invalid by the Unit Commander within five days of the assessment. If the medical evaluation validates the illness/injury, the Unit Commander may invalidate the test results. The Airman will then be required to retest within five duty days or when capable based on the recommendations of the medical provider and the Exercise Physiologist (EP).
On 2 Nov 2013, the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB) denied relief to the applicant indicating that documentation provided did not support a pre-existing medical condition precluded a passing score.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicants request, as there is insufficient evidence to support his claim. The applicant provided an AF Form 108, Physical Fitness Education and Intervention Processing, dated 15 Nov 11, and 10 Sep 12; however, he has not provided documentation from the Unit Commander indicating his/her decision to invalidate the FA (IA W AFI 36-2905 (AFGM2, 20 Dec 10) paragraph 13 and (AFGM4, 26 Jun 12) paragraph 1 0).
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit B.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 13 Dec 13 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C).
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-01087 in Executive Session on 21 May 14, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
XXXXX, Panel Chair
XXXXX, Member
XXXXX, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 4 Feb 13, w/atch.
Exhibit B. Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 15 Nov 2013,
w/atch.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 26 Nov 12.
XXXXX
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03220
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03220 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessments (FAs) dated 29 Oct 10, 28 Oct 11, and 16 Nov 12 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The applicant clarifies in his response to the Air Force Evaluation that the FA he is...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03235
The applicants last 10 FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Push Ups Rating 23 Aug 13 92.63 Exempt Excellent 29 May 13 21.38 Exempt Unsatisfactory 5 Feb 13 84.10 21/6.00 Unsatisfactory 19 Jul 12 79.67 22/6.30 Satisfactory 13 Mar 12 Exempt Exempt Exempt 21 Oct 11 85.00 19/5.50 Satisfactory *6 Sep 11 73.67 18/5.00 Unsatisfactory *20 Jul 11 81.00 16/4.30 Unsatisfactory 5 Nov 10 96.25 Exempt Excellent 14 May 10 75.20 25/8.00 Good *Contested FA On 14 Feb 14, a similar request was...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01625
According to the applicable regulation in regards to the date of the test, AFI 36-2905, members with a composite score <75 are considered Unsatisfactory. The applicants last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 7 Jun 2013 94.90 Excellent *11 Mar 13 74.30 Unsatisfactory 10 Dec 12 74.00 Unsatisfactory 28 Jun 12 85.90 Satisfactory 15 Dec 11 87.50 Satisfactory *Annotates Contested FA On 13 Mar 13, an AF FM 108 was signed by the applicants medical provider. On 16 Jan...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00860
The applicants last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 14 Oct 12 92.67 Excellent *15 Jul 12 25.50 Unsatisfactory *15 Apr 12 59.40 Unsatisfactory 11 Sept 11 84.40 Satisfactory 15 May 11 81.40 Satisfactory * Contested FA In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, if an Airman becomes injured or ill during the FA and is unable to complete all required components, he/she will have the option of being evaluated at the Medical Treatment Facility (MTF) but his/her...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01802
The applicants last eight FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 13 Nov 13 100 Excellent (Exempt from Cardio/PU) 9 May 13 100 Excellent (Exempt from Cardio/PU) *25 Mar 13 33.33 Unsatisfactory (Exempt from PU) *12 Dec 12 - Removed by FAAB 22 Jan 14 28 Jun 12 100 Excellent (Exempt from Cardio/PU/SU) *19 Mar 12 - Removed by FAAB 22 Jan 14 2 Aug 11 84.70 Satisfactory 28 Apr 11 77.90 Unsatisfactory (minimum SU) * Contested FA In accordance with guidance at the time of contested...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-05716
Beyond the cardio exemption, there is no evidence that the applicant should have been exempt from any other component. The complete AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In his response the applicant states that after receiving the Air Force advisory opinion it was clear that he did not provide the supporting medical documents, therefore he submits a copy of his...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00963
The applicants last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 5 Apr 13 90.40 Excellent 16 Jan 13 78.40 Unsatisfactory 14 Jun 12 100.00 Excellent *7 May 12 88.70 Unsatisfactory 8 Feb 12 79.90 Unsatisfactory * Contested FA In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, to determine overall fitness the Air Force uses an overall composite fitness score and minimum scores per three component areas: Aerobic Fitness (1.5 mile run), Body Composition (abdominal circumference...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03075
A list of the applicants FAs since she entered the service is as follows: Date Composite Score Sit-Ups Rating 3 Jul 13 75.67 Exempt Satisfactory *15 Apr 13 81.00 25/0.00 Unsatisfactory 23 Nov 12 87.10 38/6.00 Satisfactory 16 Apr 12 84.10 42/7.50 Satisfactory *Contested FA On 16 Dec 13, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB), on the basis that, The applicants injury was validated by the applicants medical provider, but there was no...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04939
Once her evaluation was complete, her medical provider indicated on the AF Form 108, Physical Fitness Education and Intervention Processing, that her medical condition prevented her from passing the Abdominal Circumference (AC) component of the test and precluded her from obtaining an overall passing score. DPSIM references AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program AFGM 5 (dated 3 Jan 13) stating that while the applicant had a documented medical condition that precluded her from passing, the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04196
Recommend invalidation of FA in question. A similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB), on the basis the applicant should not have completed the FA due to injury. NOTE: Original FA will count unless rendered invalid by the Unit Commander. In accordance with guidance at the time of contested FA, AFI 36-2905 (1 Jul 10), Paragraph 2.3.2., All members must complete the FSQ prior to FA (Attachment 4). In accordance with guidance at the time of...